Changes for document Conditolepis prima
on 2025/07/20 18:31
on 2025/07/20 18:31
Metadata changes
- Document author
- XWiki.
Ajdmzink
Object changes
Object number 0 of type Species.ImageInfoClass modified
- subtitle
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -//Conditolepis// //prima //(Ziegler //et// Huddle, 1969), an early member of the //C.// //glabra //lineage, from the //K//. //crepida// Zone at Jabłonna and Kadzielnia in the// //Holy Cross Mountains - P,,1,,, P,,2,,, S,,0 ,,, S,,2 ,,and M elements.
Object number 0 of type Species.SpeciesClass modified
- Autekologia
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -\\ - Literatura
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -Dzik, J. 2006. The Famennian "Golden Age" of conodonts and ammonoids in the Polish part of the Variscan sea. ~/~/Palaeontologia Polonica~/~/ 63, 1-359.1 +Dzik, J. 2006. The Famennian "Golden Age" of conodonts and ammonoids in the Polish part of the Variscan sea. //Palaeontologia Polonica// 63, 1-359. - Porównanie
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -The species is transitional between ~/~/C. tenuipunctata~/~/ and~/~/C. glabra~/~/ but usually is understood in a typological sense. However,~/~/ C. tenuipunctata~/~/ and~/~/P. unca~/~/ share the same type locality and there is nothing in the text of their original description (Sannemann 1955~/~/a~/~/) that would suggest that they occur in different horizons. Moreover, Sanemmann (1955~/~/a~/~/) illustrated typical~/~/C. glabra~/~/ from the same locality. . In material from Holy Cross Mountains~/~/C. tenuipunctata~/~/and~/~/C. glabra~/~/, as well as populations possibly transitional between them, do not differ in their apparatus composition. This refers also to the M elements and the specimen illustrated by Schülke (1999, pl. 3: 18) as belonging to~/~/C. tenuipunctata~/~/ may be atypical. Narrow-platform elements classified by Schülke (1999) in~/~/P. unca~/~/ co-occur with typical elements of~/~/C. tenuipunctata~/~/ in its late samples and the same is in the Montagne Noire material of Schülke (1999, p. 91). This suggests that these are just morphologies within monospecific populations instead of distinct species and that in the course of evolution narrow-platform elements became more and more numerous.1 +The species is transitional between //C. tenuipunctata// and //C. glabra// but usually is understood in a typological sense. However,// C. tenuipunctata// and //P. unca// share the same type locality and there is nothing in the text of their original description (Sannemann 1955//a//) that would suggest that they occur in different horizons. Moreover, Sanemmann (1955//a//) illustrated typical //C. glabra// from the same locality. . In material from Holy Cross Mountains //C. tenuipunctata //and //C. glabra//, as well as populations possibly transitional between them, do not differ in their apparatus composition. This refers also to the M elements and the specimen illustrated by Schülke (1999, pl. 3: 18) as belonging to //C. tenuipunctata// may be atypical. Narrow-platform elements classified by Schülke (1999) in //P. unca// co-occur with typical elements of //C. tenuipunctata// in its late samples and the same is in the Montagne Noire material of Schülke (1999, p. 91). This suggests that these are just morphologies within monospecific populations instead of distinct species and that in the course of evolution narrow-platform elements became more and more numerous.